Agenda item

Erection of 13 Sheltered Housing bungalows for persons 55 years old or older, and a new community facility building (on the site of the recently demolished sheltered housing building).

 

The application is before the Planning Committee as Tendring District Council is the applicant.

Minutes:

Committee members were told that this application was before the Planning Committee as Tendring District Council was the applicant.

 

Members were told that the application proposed the erection of 13 Sheltered Housing properties alongside a communal building. The site fell within the Settlement Development boundary for Lawford, whilst NPPG guidance sought to provide specialist housing for older people.

 

Committee members heard that the design, scale and layout of the proposal was supported by Officers, and that therefore there would not be significant harm to the amenities of neighbouring properties.

 

Members also heard that there would not be significant harm to existing trees and that ECC Ecology supported the proposal subject to conditions.

 

The Committee had before it the published Officer report containing the key planning issues, relevant planning policies, planning history, any response from consultees, written representations received and a recommendation of approval.

 

At the meeting, an oral presentation was made by the Council’s Planning Officer (MP) in respect of the application.

 

An update sheet had been circulated to the Committee prior to the meeting with details of the Unilateral Undertaking and additional representations showing support for the application:

 

“23/00929/FUL - Erection of 13 Sheltered Housing bungalows for persons 55 years old or older, and a new community facility building (on the site of recently demolished sheltered housing building).

Honeycroft & 2 Waldegrave Way, Lawford,  Manningtree CO11 2DX

Unilateral Undertaking

 

The Unilateral Undertaking to secure a financial contribution towards the Essex Coast Recreational Disturbance Avoidance and Mitigation Strategy (RAMS) has now been completed.

 

Additional Representations

 

A letter has been received from Councillor Giancarlo Guglielmi on behalf of himself, Councillor Terry Barrett and Lawford Parish Council in support of the application, which reads as follows:

 

We write to express our combined strong support for this application, and we are sorry for not having submitted this representation before now.

 

The Chairman of Lawford Parish Council will attend the site visit on Thursday 28th September, but although we would have very much liked to have made our representation in person, regretfully we will not be able to attend the Committee meeting because of previous commitments.

 

We are delighted that this application will now be heard and determined by the Members of the Planning Committee, and we very much hope that they will agree with the Officer’s recommendation and approve this scheme that has been long time coming.

 

We would like to thank the Property Team for the huge amount of work they have put into preparing this application, and come with a scheme that will offer first class accommodation for Tendring residents over 55, and as this site previously known as Honeycroft Sheltered Housing, has historically provided accommodation to people who had Lawford, Mistley, and Manningtree connections, we would very much like that this unwritten policy should continue.

 

We are very pleased to see that CONDITION 5 addresses the potential disturbance to neighbouring properties with regards to noise, dust, and the various stages of construction, as well as including a scheme to review issues with neighbours and the registration and details of the Considerate Constructors Scheme.

 

We are likewise very pleased to see that 3 CONDITION addresses 6.40 of the report that talks about Policies PPL10 and SPL3, that require consideration to be given to renewable energy generation and conservation measures.

Although actual details have not been submitted with the proposal, we are happy that this will be dealt with by Officers.

 

We very much hope that Members will share our view of support for this proposal and we very much look forward to seeing this site that has sat empty for a very long time, being once again able to provide housing; and in some cases, free up larger council properties to those residents over 55 who would like to have scaled down but because there was nothing available have not been able to.

 

This will be excellent news to so many people on the Housing Register who are waiting for two- and three-bedrooms accommodation.

 

And if this scheme is approved it could become a great model to address other Council owned Housing Schemes that are now coming to the end of their time.

 

We thank you all for reading this and for taking it in consideration when you will debate the application on Thursday 28th September.”

 

Chris Wragg, an agent for the applicant, spoke in support of the application.

 

The Portfolio Holder (Housing & Planning), Councillor Andy Baker, spoke in support of the application.

 

Matters raised by Members of the Committee:-

Officer’s response thereto:-

 

 

How long before it is built and the first resident is moved in? Can we have an assurance that it isn’t 6 years?

It has to be started within 3 years. Our understanding is that it will be started before Christmas.

Will the new policy around Biodiversity Net-Gain (BNG) coming in have an effect on this application?

There are no biodiversity considerations at this moment. The Council have contacted Essex County Council who have had no objections. We are not at the point just yet to have these considerations for this application.

This is a tight site so are we sure it can’t be affected?

This application is being determined under present legislation and not future legislation therefore, it is not affected. Any future applications at this site would be subjected to any future legislation.

Can we have an assurance that no other trees will be affected by this other than the 3 trees mentioned in the report?

In Paragraph 6.29 of the report, the loss of three small trees is acceptable. Arboricultural Impact Assessment (AIA) says other trees will be protected. 

Is it a community building or gardens? Where is this on the site?

It is a community building – Officer pointed to it on the screens provided.

 

It was moved by Councillor Alexander, seconded by Councillor Harris, and unanimously:-

 

RESOLVED that:

 

1)    the Head of Planning and Building Control be authorised to grant planning permission, subject to the agreed section 106 agreement and the planning conditions as stated at paragraph 8.2 of the Officer report, or varied as is necessary to ensure the wording is enforceable, precise, and reasonable in all other respects, including appropriate updates, so long as the principle of the conditions as referenced is retained; and,

 

2)    the sending of informative notes to the applicant as may be deemed necessary.

Supporting documents: