Issue - meetings

Proposed 3 bedroom bungalow to land to the side.

It was reported that this application had been referred to the Committee by Councillor Winfield, a local Ward Member, as he considered the proposed development to be contrary to planning policies HG9, HG14, TR1A and that, in addition, the roots of neighbouring mature trees were in danger of being damaged during the construction period.

The Committee was aware that Unilateral Undertakings had already been completed to secure a financial contribution towards RAMS of £122.30 for the one dwelling proposed and a payment towards enhancements to the safety surface at the Hereford Road Play Area.

The Committee had before it the published Officer report containing the key planning issues, relevant planning policies, planning history, any response from consultees, written representations received and a recommendation of approval.

At the meeting, an oral presentation was made by the Council’s Planning Team Leader (AN) in respect of the application.

An update sheet was circulated to the Committee prior to the meeting with details of amendments to the Officer report.

Chris Pitak, a local resident, spoke against the application.

Councillor Winfield, a local Ward Member, spoke against the application.

James Thomas, the agent acting on behalf of the applicant, spoke in support of the application.

Following discussion by the Committee, it was moved by Councillor Bray seconded by Councillor Alexander and RESOLVED that, contrary to the Officer’s recommendation of approval, the Head of Planning (or equivalent authorised officer) be authorised to refuse planning permission for the development due to the following reason:-

Contrary to Policy HG14 (i) development would not be appropriate in its setting and would create a cramped appearance.