Issue - meetings

To enable Cabinet to give consideration to recommendations made to it by the Service Development and Delivery Committee in respect of the above.

That the recommendations of the Environment Portfolio Holder be approved.

Cabinet was informed that, at the meeting of the Service Development and Delivery Committee held on 3 April 2017, Members had been informed about the decline in fly tipping performance by the Council’s Head of Environmental Services (John Fox) and Street Scene Officer (Jon Hamlet).

The following areas were covered:

(1)  The varying levels of fly tipping – a black bin bag to a tipper load;

(2)  The Council’s target for clearing 90% of all reported fly tipping incidents within 72 hours;

(3)  Clearing carried out by Veolia, who the Council had a contract with;

(4)  Reasons why performance may vary;

(5)  Grouping of workload where possible to help performance;

(6)  Statistics;

(7)  Difficulties/issues experienced; and

(8)  Causes of delays.

The Committee had agreed that Cabinet be recommended to –

(a)  the Service Development and Delivery Committee being concerned about the extent of fly-tipping, which is a criminal offence, around the District request Cabinet to investigate the extent of the Council’s surveillance powers and the extent of the penalties the Council could expect to be imposed if a prosecution is successful; and

(b)  an analysis be undertaken to understand the cost of surveillance versus possible fines that could be imposed.

The Cabinet had before it the following comments and recommendations of the Environment Portfolio Holder made in response to the recommendations of the Service Development and Delivery Committee (SDDC):

“COMMENTS:

“I thank SDDC for its recommendation.

Fly-tipping is the dumping of waste in or on any land without a licence or knowingly causing or permitting that waste to be dumped in such circumstances: it is a criminal offence.

On conviction in the Magistrates’ Court an offender is liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding 12 months, or a fine not exceeding £50,000, or both.

On conviction in the Crown Court an offender is liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding 5 years, or an unlimited fine, or both.

Fixed penalty notices (FPN) can be issued to offenders.  In issuing FPNs or prosecuting, the burden of proof is on the Authority issuing the FPN or prosecuting and, as these are criminal offences, the standard of proof is high and requires that the prosecution prove the case “beyond all reasonable doubt” or “so that you are sure”.  Therefore, suitable evidence is necessary to prove the Council’s case.

A power by constables or authorised officers of an enforcement authority to search and seize vehicles used in the fly-tipping is available following which there is a duty on the authority to deal with the seized property in accordance with the appropriate regulations.

Covert surveillance is carried out without the subject’s knowledge that they are being watched, whereas overt surveillance is performed using devices that are visible and obvious, and with appropriate signs being displayed.

Covert surveillance falls in to two categories and is regularised by Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA):

(i)            intrusive surveillance which can only be carried out by the police or other law enforcement agency, e.g. HMRC; or  ...  view the full minutes text for item 53