Issue - meetings

Proposed replacement of three poultry units with 1 x three bed dwelling (in lieu of prior approval 19/00358/COUNOT).

With the approval of the Chairman of the Committee, Planning Application 19/00909/FUL was moved to be considered at an earlier stage in the agenda, the meeting would then proceed as normal.

The Committee had before it the published Officer report containing the key planning issues, relevant planning policies, planning history, any response from consultees, written representations received and a recommendation of approval.

At the meeting an oral presentation was made by the Council’s Planning Team Leader (TF) in respect of the application.

An update sheet was circulated to the Committee prior to the meeting with details of:

(1) Amendments to paragraphs 1.3 and 6.4

Marilyn Peck, a local resident, spoke against the application.

Parish Councillor Trudy Carr, representing Beaumont Parish Council, spoke against the application.

Councillor Daniel Land, a local Ward Member, spoke against the application.

Peter Le Grys, the agent of behalf of the applicant, spoke in support of the application.

Following discussion by the Committee, it was moved by Councillor Bray, seconded by Councillor McWilliams and RESOLVED that the Head of Planning (or equivalent authorised officer) be authorised to grant planning permission for the development, subject to:

a)    Within 6 (six) months of the date of the Committee’s resolution to approve, the completion of a legal agreement under the provisions of section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 dealing with the following matters (where relevant):

·         Financial Contribution towards RAMS

b)    the conditions stated below, subject to a correction to condition 9 to include the word ‘not’.

c)    That the Head of Planning be authorised to refuse planning permission in the event that such legal agreement has not been completed within the period of 6 (six) months, as the requirements necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms had not been secured through a Section 106 planning obligation.

Conditions and Reasons

1.    The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason – To comply with the requirements of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as amended by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004

2.    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans and documents; Drawing No. BHR-101 Revision A, Block Plan – Demolition Plan scanned 6^th August and Planning Statement dated June 2019.

Reason – for the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.

3.    There should be no obstruction above ground level within a 2.4 m wide parallel band visibility splay as measured from and along the nearside edge of the carriageway across the entire site frontage. Such vehicular visibility splays shall be provided before the access is first used by vehicular traffic for the three residential dwellings and retained free of any obstruction at all times.

Reason – To provide adequate inter-visibility between users of the access and the public highway in the interests of highway safety.

4.    No unbound material shall be used in  ...  view the full minutes text for item 45