Decision details
Decision Maker: Assets & Community Safety Portfolio Holder, Leader of the Council and Corporate Finance & Governance Portfolio Holder, Leisure and Public Realm Portfolio Holder
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
Decision:
(a) That the Portfolio Holder for Finance and Governance and Portfolio Holder for Leisure and Public Realm agree to include the refurbishment of the Leisure Centre entrance road into the existing contract with Marlborough Ltd and allocate an additional £24,000 to the Vista Road Car Park Capital budget from the annual revenue contribution to the Leisure Capital Projects Reserve.
(b) That subject to (a) above, the Portfolio Holders for Finance and Governance together with the Portfolio Holder for Assets agree an exemption to the Council’s procurement rules to instruct Marlborough Ltd to undertake this work as a variation on the existing contract to resurface the Vista Road Car Park.
(c) That authority to vary the original contract with Marlborough Ltd is delegated to the Assistant Director (Building and Public Realm).
AN EXEMPTION TO CALL IN HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE RESOURCES AND SERVICES OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
Reasons for the decision:
The current Clacton Leisure Centre car park
resurfacing project requires a further £24,000 to top up the
existing budget of £298,000 to complete the entry road
resurfacing works in order to fully resurface the carpark.
This decision agrees the additional funds required to extend the
current project and a further decision will be brought forward from
Building and Public Realm regarding contract variation should the
funds be approved.
Further to above, the decision also allows for an exemption to the
Council’s procurement rules to instruct Marlborough Ltd to
complete the works under a variation on the contract. This is due
to the contractor already undertaking resurfacing works at the
site. Procuring the resurface of the entrance road as a stand along
project is considered likely to be more expensive.
Alternative options considered:
An alternative not option to omit the
resurfacing of the entrance road into the contract, will eventually
result in further surface complication, as the entrance road will
continue to deteriorate over time. Additional funds would need to
be sourced in the future to complete this work, and it would be
more expensive being addressed as a separate project.
Publication date: 12/06/2024
Date of decision: 12/06/2024
Accompanying Documents: