On 20 December 2024, Cabinet accepted the Community Regeneration Partnership funding and commenced delivery. Prior to this, the programme was accepted into the Policy Framework by Full Council on 8 June 2024 and the principle of entering the Partnership approved by Cabinet on 26 July 2024. Subsequently, the funding has been received and a Memorandum of Understanding entered with MHCLG which includes TDC as the Accountable Body. The funding period lasts until 31 March 2026.
The appointment of the required services are necessary to progress the project through to delivery, including achieving defrayment in line with the MOU.
The Council has conducted a procurement process in line with the constitution to procure a competent consultant with a comprehensive skill set including landscape architect, Principal Designer, engineering and community engagement.
The appointment includes roles relevant to health and safety and the Building Regulations required by legislation, ensuring the Council complies with its client duties for the works.
In parallel to the above, officers have conducted Requests for Quotation exercises for the site investigations, in line with the relevant clauses of the Council’s Procurement Procedure Rules, subject to the value of the specific surveys. Site investigations are important to enable risk and cost management.

To enter into a call off agreement with Bloom Procurement Services Ltd (company number 08045123) for the provision of consultancy services, incorporating multi-disciplinary design team services to be provided by Adams & Sutherland Architects Ltd, for the Ten_09 Jaywick Public Open Spaces project which is being delivered as part of the Community Regeneration Partnership funding programme.

The services have a total cost of £228,360.00 plus VAT (including 10% contingency).

To procure surveys and site investigations as required for the project delivery: including (but not limited to) topographic, utility and ecology; as required for the proper delivery of the project, including for cost and risk management, statutory consents and health & safety, limited by the budget of £20,000 as set out within the approved Project Initiation Document.

Option 1 – Not to appoint this company: In line with the Procurement Procedure Rules a minimum of four tenderers were invited for this opportunity and three tender returns were received. The proposed appointment was evaluated by a panel of officers as meeting the Council’s requirements, including social value, and providing the most competitive value for money.
Option 2 – Not to appoint at this time: Due to the limited funding envelope, delaying appointing to this key role in the project team could negatively impact on the feasibility of the project and risk the funding secured.
Option 3 – Not to appoint an external consultant: this approach was not selected due to there not being sufficient capacity from sufficiently qualified and experienced personnel within Council teams to be resourced to the project.
Option 4 – Not to progress the project: this would forfeit significant government funding and the opportunity to address important local issues, and could impact on the Council’s access to central government regeneration funding in the future.